Britain proposes Syria resolution; Russia objects

Syrian Ambassador to the United Nations Bashar Ja'afari speaks to reporters after a meeting about Syria at United Nations headquarters Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013. The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council met informally to discuss the language of a draft resolution that would authorize the use of military force against Syria. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Syrian Ambassador to the United Nations Bashar Ja'afari speaks to reporters after a meeting about Syria at United Nations headquarters Wednesday, Aug. 28, 2013. The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council met informally to discuss the language of a draft resolution that would authorize the use of military force against Syria. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

UNITED NATIONS (AP) – The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council failed to reach an agreement Wednesday on a British-proposed resolution that would authorize the use of military force against Syria.

The draft resolution – if it were to be put to a vote – would almost certainly be vetoed by Russia and China, which have blocked past attempts to sanction President Bashar Assad’s regime.

Britain put forth the proposal Wednesday as momentum seemed to be building among Western allies for a strike against Syria. U.S. officials, including Vice President Joe Biden, have charged that Assad’s government used deadly chemical weapons near Damascus last week.

The U.S. has not presented concrete proof, and U.N. inspectors currently in Syria to investigate alleged chemical attacks have not endorsed the allegations.

After the ambassadors met for a couple of hours at U.N. headquarters, the draft resolution was being sent back to their governments for consultations, according to a Western diplomat, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the discussions were private.

The diplomat said Russia reiterated its objections to international intervention in the Syrian crisis.

U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power and British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant left the meeting without commenting to reporters.

A spokesman for British Prime Minister David Cameron said in London that the British draft resolution would authorize “all necessary measures under Chapter 7 of the U.N. Charter to protect civilians from chemical weapons.”

Chapter 7 allows the use of international armed force to back up U.N. decisions.

Speaking Wednesday from The Hague, Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said no action should be taken until the U.N. chemical weapons inspectors finish their work.

“Let them conclude … their work for four days and then we will have to analyze scientifically” their findings and send a report to the Security Council, he said.

The U.N. said the analysis would be done “as quickly as possible.”

Ban also pleaded for more time to give diplomacy another chance to end the more than two-year conflict that has killed more than 100,000 people.

But the secretary-general added that the Security Council must not go “missing in action.”

(Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

blog comments powered by Disqus